Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/rows in repetition champ #58

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 31, 2023
Merged

Conversation

DIDIERRobin
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Adding rows in repetition champ
  • Adding a new getDossierWithCustomChamp function to have descriptors of champ with champ

@baudointran baudointran changed the base branch from main to dev July 24, 2023 16:51
package.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DIDIERRobin DIDIERRobin force-pushed the feat/rows-in-repetition-champ branch from 1056be1 to 8995387 Compare July 31, 2023 07:08
@DIDIERRobin DIDIERRobin marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2023 07:08
@DIDIERRobin DIDIERRobin force-pushed the feat/rows-in-repetition-champ branch from 6df1db0 to 116a06e Compare July 31, 2023 07:39
@baudointran
Copy link
Collaborator

il y a un wip dans le comment du premier commentaire.
A retirer

@DIDIERRobin DIDIERRobin force-pushed the feat/rows-in-repetition-champ branch from 116a06e to 0f83704 Compare July 31, 2023 07:41
@DIDIERRobin DIDIERRobin force-pushed the feat/rows-in-repetition-champ branch from 2cdf9b6 to 696a504 Compare July 31, 2023 12:53
@DIDIERRobin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Réponse commentaire @baudointran : j'ai finalement compris et j'ai changé la varleur de updatedSince.

@DIDIERRobin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Les test unitaires faisant des vrai appels à DS attendant des vrai données avec un vrai token ont été supprimé

@baudointran baudointran self-requested a review July 31, 2023 12:54
@DIDIERRobin DIDIERRobin merged commit f73a651 into dev Jul 31, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants